Why we give SP feedback in the third person

It's critical nursing students gain confidence in their ability to perform.

Share This Post

When teaching on Simulated Participant (SP) Feedback, we are often asked why we teach SPs to give feedback in the third person. An example of using the third person in feedback is starting each comment with “the patient felt…” or “Sarah felt…,” rather than using I-statements. By starting each comment in this manner, it removes any perceived personal feeling or bias. This can lead to some confusion on why we use the third person when the SP is playing the patient and the one experiencing the care. We will dive into this methodology and the top five reasons behind this practice

It levels the playing field.

It can be intimidating to give feedback to medical professionals on their performance in simulation. Third-person feedback reduces the concern that the learner will feel attacked and allow the SP to speak objectively from the perspective of the patient. “I felt offended or upset when the doctor…” can come off as a personal judgment. The job of the simulated participant is to remain neutral while offering the patient’s perspective. This allows the learner to see the interaction through the eyes of the patient, which stimulates reframing and encourages learning.

Removing the personal feelings of the SP is especially important for characters who are more challenging or difficult in the simulation. When I play a college student named Jessie who is frustrated about the care she has received and spends the majority of the simulation discussing their drunken escapades the night before, my instinct is to follow up any negative comment with “but the patient was very difficult.” When that happens, you are removing any impact or validity of the comment. However, if it is how the patient felt, then it is valid and important. We encourage our SPs to break after the simulation, make an introduction to cut the tension, and deliver their feedback, reminding the students that this is coming from how the patient felt during the simulation.

It removes defensive behaviors.

Receiving constructive feedback can be difficult to hear, especially if it is coming from an outside or an alternative perspective. Learners have established a relationship with the patient, not the SP. When feedback is given from the person the learners have established a trusting relationship with, the energy in the room remains open and paves the way for reflective questions and dialogue between the learners and the SP.

It reinforces patient-centered care principles.

When speaking from the patient’s perspective, the simulated participant refocuses the learners on the patient’s perception. It cannot be argued if it is correct or incorrect; it is how the patient felt and that cannot be denied or excused by the learner. There is an industry-wide paradigm shift to a patient-centered care model which is difficult to teach or reinforce with other learning modalities. Every effort must be given to appropriately represent the patient whenever there is an opportunity to do so. Let’s include them as a part of both the care and the education team.

It adds authenticity to the patient.

The patient in the simulation does not reflect the personal opinions or perceptions of the simulated participant. We teach them to embody the gestalt of the patient for realism as well as identifying feedback points unique to this patient’s persona. If speaking in the first person, it would feel unnatural to take ownership of these comments because it is not a personally held belief; the feedback is truly coming from the patient.

An example of this would be when playing a patient that has paranoia, Alex Timsdale. This patient picks up on things that I do not personally identify with. If Alex would hear nurses whispering over at the sink, Alex would think that they were talking about her or plotting some sort of evil. When I play the patient, I am aware that they are not saying bad things about the patient but from her perspective, that is how she would perceive the whispering. When I bring that up in feedback, it would not feel natural to say, “I felt defensive when I heard the nurses whispering at the sink.” But the patient would feel defensive in that situation. So, I can say “Alex felt defensive when she heard whispering at the sink.”

If an SP is truly embodying the patient throughout the simulation, feedback delivered after the simulation is over is actually the patient’s feedback. It reinforces the need to embody the patient that they are representing, rather than go through the simulation regurgitating a memorized script.

It removes personal bias.

The goal of including a simulated participant is not to hear personal views, but to hear how the patient perceived the interaction. It allows you to teach in a manner that is consistent and for your simulated participants to truly understand that their contribution to the debriefing process is from the lens of the patient; not their personal feelings on how care was provided. It allows them to fully submerge themselves into the character they are portraying.

There are many benefits to teaching your simulated participants how to utilize the third person in simulation. It always helps them to fully embody the character in every simulation experience and creates a relaxed environment to deliver feedback. If you are interested in learning more about training and techniques for utilizing simulated participants, book a meeting to learn more about SP consulting opportunities.

(Visited 544 times, 1 visits today)

Subscribe To Our Blog

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

Regis College Highlights Wearable Simulators in Haiti Course

Avkin Simulators Highlighted in Regis in Haiti Course

Regis College in Weston, Massachusetts, held a 2-week, face-to-face course designed to enhance the simulation skills of Haitian nurse educators. The course adhered to the INACSL Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice, HSSBP. The nine Haitian nurse educators who attended are in leadership positions at various hospitals and nursing schools across Haiti. Avkin’s wearable simulators

Get Your Resource

ACCESS AVKIN'S PRICING BROCHURE NOW.

Get Your Resource

EMPOWER YOURSELF TO DISCUSS PROGRAM CHANGES WITH LEADERSHIP.

Get Your Resource

THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN AVKIN'S SIMULATIONS, MEET YOUR NEWEST PATIENT, JACOB.

Avthor, a wearable chest tube care simulator, replicates the intrathoracic pressures needed to realistically teach the assessment and care of a patient with a chest tube. When pairing the Avthor with a live patient, the simulation can include repositioning, transferring, and/or ambulating a patient with a chest tube.

Avthor

Avtone, the world’s only wearable auscultation simulator, offers a compact and lightweight design, comfortable for the live patient to wear. An anatomically correct chest piece allows novice and advanced students to identify proper landmarks just as they would in the clinical setting. Volume controls allow learners and educators to pinpoint the finer details of the actual patient recorded sounds contained within the Avtone.

Avtone

Avstick, a wearable IV simulator worn as a left-arm sleeve, allows learners to practice high-fidelity IV insertion during simulation. The wearable simulator cues the live patient wearing the sleeve through haptic vibration when the needle first pierces the smart skin. Multiple layers of woven plastic have been integrated into premium silicone to protect the wearer from any harm during the simulation.

Avstick

Avtrach, a high-fidelity, wearable tracheostomy simulator, is designed to replicate an anterior thorax so tracheostomy care and suctioning can be authentically replicated in simulation. Through a Bluetooth connection between Avtrach and the Avkin app, an assortment of lung sounds can be changed at any time by the educator from the control room. These lungs allow for the Avtrach to be connected to a ventilator and the patient to be in line with suctioning.

Avtrach

Avwound, a high-fidelity, wearable wound care simulator, is the most significant technological advancement for wound care in the industry. Learners can assess, measure, document, and provide care for all four stages of pressure wounds in addition to an assortment of surgical wounds providing educators with maximum flexibility for wound care education.

Avwound

Meant to replace the need for including bulky ineffective earpieces in simulation, Avband, is a smartwatch look-a-like for inconspicuous 3-way communication between the control room, patient, and Avkin simulators. An alert button on the side of the product allows the live patient to send a panic notification to the control room if they feel psychologically and/or physically unsafe at any time during the simulation.

Avband

With the world’s only fully-automated, wearable birthing simulator, Avbirth, you can now include learning objectives such as closed-looped communication with an interprofessional team and therapeutic communication with the patient and their significant other through all phases of labor and delivery. Avbirth pairs with the Avkin App, allowing a multitude of simulations to be performed, including additional challenges for the development of critical thinking, such as shoulder dystocia or postpartum hemorrhage.

Avbirth

Avcath, a high-fidelity, wearable urinary catheterization simulator, seamlessly replicates the human urinary system. The interchangeable male (circumcised or uncircumcised) and female genitalia allows learners to practice various types of urinary catheterization while also practicing essential communication skills. Our genitalia is made with high-quality silicone, allowing learners to use betadine and lubrication right out of their kits.

Avcath

Avline, a wearable central line simulator, delivers a high-fidelity patient experience for a multitude of central venous care (CVC) simulations. This innovative simulator has two options for central venous treatment and care, a right subclavian triple lumen or a left subclavian implanted port; each option is removable, allowing the educator flexibility with learning outcomes.

Avline

KBPort's BPSim is a blood pressure cuff simulator. Used just like any other blood pressure cuff, the readings are controlled via a smartphone app. It can be programmed for any blood pressure range, including hypotension, normal, pre-hypertension, hypertension (stages 1 & 2), and hypertensive crisis.

BPSim

Getting accurate vital signs is critical when assessing a patient. With Innov2Learn's Thermometer and Oximeter devices, your learners will use real devices to capture and record simulated readings. No longer will you have to break fidelity to provide vital signs to your learners

Innov2Learn Pulse OX

Quality training is the most important element of working with live people in simulations. An untrained simulated participant (SP) can challenge the efficacy of your learning opportunities. A well-trained simulated participant (SP) can bring your simulations to life in ways you never thought possible. With all of this in mind, training an entire group of SPs can be time-consuming and feel intimidating.

Desktop

Innov2Learn's training devices function the same as any thermometer or oximeter you would find in a clinic. Your learners will take vital signs using real devices with readouts you control via Bluetooth. You can use a smartphone app or desktop computer.

Innov2Learn Thermometer

Get Your Resource

9 KEYS TO HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION WITH LIVE PEOPLE​

Get Your Resource

STANDARDIZED PATIENT CHARACTER DESCRIPTION OUTLINE

Get Your Resource

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS FOR STANDARDIZED PATIENT ONBOARDING

Get Your Resource

STANDARDIZED PATIENT FEEDBACK TEMPLATE

Get Your Resource

STANDARDIZED PATIENT SAMPLE JOB POSTING

Get Your Resource

5 KEYS TO CONSIDER WHEN UTILIZING STANDARDIZED PATIENTS

Get Your Resource

A SIMULATIONIST'S GUIDE TO HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION