Simulations Stick With Simulated Participants

Share This Post

Abstract

Simulated Participants (SPs), also known as Standardized Patients, prove more effective and provide reality that is difficult to achieve with high-fidelity human patient simulator mannequins. In a study comparing the efficacy of human patient simulator mannequins and SPs, the authors found the scenarios using SPs yielded better results in several areas.  In the article “Assessing the performance and satisfaction of medical residents utilizing standardized patient versus mannequin-simulated training,” the participants interacting with SPs scored higher on outcomes testing and reported more realistic interactions. 

Simulations that Stick 

Simulation-based education has rapidly increased in the past 5 years (Alsaad, et al., 2017).  The use of standardized patients has expanded to include multiple human role players interacting with learners in a variety of positions within the simulation pedagogy and are more correctly coined simulated participants according to The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practices. Simulation “is a major path compliant with best educational standards and ethical principles in the process of medical education.” With the use of high-fidelity human patient simulators, the personal effect and face-to-face communication skills are not always emphasized, nor can they be entirely replicated.  Interaction with SPs provides a more realistic interaction within the simulation (Alsaad, et al., 2017).  Using hybrid simulations, which include SPs and wearable simulation technology, is the richest learning environment in simulation education.

In their study, Alsad et al. (2017) report improved knowledge retention and higher test scores from participants interacting with SPs over mannequins. Test scores were higher for the residents in the SP group on post-tests and they reported more realism than the residents in the mannequin group (Alsaad, et al., 2017).  The power of using SPs can be seen in the study results which revealed a 36% improvement in overall scores for the SP group while the mannequin group only improved by 24% (Alsaad, et al., 2017).  Even more telling, in one scenario there was an improvement of 48% from the original score with the SP group while the mannequin group only saw a 26% improvement (Alsaad, et al., 2017).

The financial constraints of simulation education limit many educational programs from full curricular integration. The authors of the study point out that SPs provide a cost-effective alternative to high-fidelity human patient simulators (Alsaad, et al., 2017).  Academic institutions can build a robust SP program on a very tight budget. Hospital systems may be able to recruit volunteers or pull from existing medical and educational staff, provide the necessary education, and fill the SP positions with less financial impact (Alsaad, et al., 2017). 

Using hybrid simulations which include SPs and wearable simulation technology, translates seamlessly to the bedside, improves knowledge retention and higher test scores, while providing progress in the evolution of simulation education to the highest fidelity possible. The opportunities to address institutional risk assessment training, patient satisfaction scores, and ongoing education for staff will also find more bang for the buck with this educational model with proven results.  People trained with people, treating AND caring for people with improved safety and better patient outcomes.

(Visited 487 times, 1 visits today)

Subscribe To Our Blog

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

NLN/Jefferies Framework for SP Methodology

Avkin CEO Highlighted for NLN/Jeffries Framework of Standardized Patients

The article, available at ScienceDirect.com, explores the evidence related to how undergraduate nursing education utilizes an established framework when integrating standardized patient simulation. The identified gaps included: The lack of safety application, standardized patient hiring, using higher-level outcomes, establishing policies and procedures specific to SPs, and discussing the experiences of students, facilitators, and standardized patients.

Avtrach, a high-fidelity, wearable tracheostomy simulator, is designed to replicate an anterior thorax so tracheostomy care and suctioning can be authentically replicated in simulation. Through a Bluetooth connection between Avtrach and the Avkin app, an assortment of lung sounds can be changed at any time by the educator from the control room. These lungs allow for the Avtrach to be connected to a ventilator and the patient to be in line with suctioning.

Wearable Tracheostomy Simulator

Avwound, a high-fidelity, wearable wound care simulator, is the most significant technological advancement for wound care in the industry. Learners can assess, measure, document, and provide care for all four stages of pressure wounds in addition to an assortment of surgical wounds providing educators with maximum flexibility for wound care education.

Wearable Wound Care Simulator

Meant to replace the need for including bulky ineffective earpieces in simulation, Avband, is a smartwatch look-a-like for inconspicuous 3-way communication between the control room, patient, and Avkin simulators. An alert button on the side of the product allows the live patient to send a panic notification to the control room if they feel psychologically and/or physically unsafe at any time during the simulation.

Simulated Participant Cueing Device

With the world’s only fully-automated, wearable birthing simulator, Avbirth, you can now include learning objectives such as closed-looped communication with an interprofessional team and therapeutic communication with the patient and their significant other through all phases of labor and delivery. Avbirth pairs with the Avkin App, allowing a multitude of simulations to be performed, including additional challenges for the development of critical thinking, such as shoulder dystocia or postpartum hemorrhage.

Simulated Birthing Device

Avcath, a high-fidelity, wearable urinary catheterization simulator, seamlessly replicates the human urinary system. The interchangeable male (circumcised or uncircumcised) and female genitalia allows learners to practice various types of urinary catheterization while also practicing essential communication skills. Our genitalia is made with high-quality silicone, allowing learners to use betadine and lubrication right out of their kits.

Wearable Urinary Catheterization Simulator

Avline, a wearable central line simulator, delivers a high-fidelity patient experience for a multitude of central venous care (CVC) simulations. This innovative simulator has two options for central venous treatment and care, a right subclavian triple lumen or a left subclavian implanted port; each option is removable, allowing the educator flexibility with learning outcomes.

Wearable Central Line Simulator

Avstick, a wearable IV simulator worn as a left-arm sleeve, allows learners to practice high-fidelity IV insertion during simulation. The wearable simulator cues the live patient wearing the sleeve through haptic vibration when the needle first pierces the smart skin. Multiple layers of woven plastic have been integrated into premium silicone to protect the wearer from any harm during the simulation.

Wearable IV Simulator

Avtone, the world’s only wearable auscultation simulator, offers a compact and lightweight design, comfortable for the live patient to wear. An anatomically correct chest piece allows novice and advanced students to identify proper landmarks just as they would in the clinical setting. Volume controls allow learners and educators to pinpoint the finer details of the actual patient recorded sounds contained within the Avtone.

Wearable Auscultation Simulator

Avthor, a wearable chest tube care simulator, replicates the intrathoracic pressures needed to realistically teach the assessment and care of a patient with a chest tube. When pairing the Avthor with a live patient, the simulation can include repositioning, transferring, and/or ambulating a patient with a chest tube.

Wearable Chest Tube Care Simulator

Get Your Resource

ACCESS AVKIN'S PRICING BROCHURE NOW.

Get Your Resource

EMPOWER YOURSELF TO DISCUSS PROGRAM CHANGES WITH LEADERSHIP.

Get Your Resource

THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN AVKIN'S SIMULATIONS, MEET YOUR NEWEST PATIENT, JACOB.

KBPort's BPSim is a blood pressure cuff simulator. Used just like any other blood pressure cuff, the readings are controlled via a smartphone app. It can be programmed for any blood pressure range, including hypotension, normal, pre-hypertension, hypertension (stages 1 & 2), and hypertensive crisis.

BPSim

Getting accurate vital signs is critical when assessing a patient. With Innov2Learn's Thermometer and Oximeter devices, your learners will use real devices to capture and record simulated readings. No longer will you have to break fidelity to provide vital signs to your learners

Innov2Learn Pulse OX

Quality training is the most important element of working with live people in simulations. An untrained simulated participant (SP) can challenge the efficacy of your learning opportunities. A well-trained simulated participant (SP) can bring your simulations to life in ways you never thought possible. With all of this in mind, training an entire group of SPs can be time-consuming and feel intimidating.

Desktop

Innov2Learn's training devices function the same as any thermometer or oximeter you would find in a clinic. Your learners will take vital signs using real devices with readouts you control via Bluetooth. You can use a smartphone app or desktop computer.

Innov2Learn Thermometer

Get Your Resource

9 KEYS TO HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION WITH LIVE PEOPLE​

Get Your Resource

STANDARDIZED PATIENT CHARACTER DESCRIPTION OUTLINE

Get Your Resource

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS FOR STANDARDIZED PATIENT ONBOARDING

Get Your Resource

STANDARDIZED PATIENT FEEDBACK TEMPLATE

Get Your Resource

STANDARDIZED PATIENT SAMPLE JOB POSTING

Get Your Resource

5 KEYS TO CONSIDER WHEN UTILIZING STANDARDIZED PATIENTS

Get Your Resource

A SIMULATIONIST'S GUIDE TO HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION